creativity/machine

A personal research blog about vernacular creativity and technology by Jean Burgess.
  • Blog
  • About
  • YouTube Book
  • Research
    • PhD Project: Vernacular Creativity and New Media
    • MPhil Project: Brisbane’s Contemporary Chamber Music Scene
      • M.Phil Bibliography
  • Publications
  • Contact

just (describe) it

3 10 2006

Someone in our AoIR panel on Friday asked me if I was ‘using’ Bruno Latour and/or ANT, and I more or less denied it, probably misinterpreting the question slightly, under the influence of adrenaline. Anyway, afterwards I realised that I was far too flippant in my response. Because of course, at least implicitly I kind of am ‘using’ it.

Quite by accident, I ran across this Dialogue on ANT by Latour soon after having the thudding three-fold realisation that:

1. the reason my word count isn’t screaming along as fast as I know it could be is that I’m being far too parsimonious in regard to description;

2. I should avoid the endless roadblocks I create for myself by ‘reconceptualising’, at least for the moment, and just write my way through all the stuff of my case studies; and

3. that’s how I’ve finished everything else I’ve ever finished writing.

Since that head-slapping thunderbolt hit, everything’s going smoothly again. Perhaps the infamous word count picometer may even return soon.

So, anyway, here’s Latour in Socratic Professor mode:

Student — May I politely remark that, for all your exceedingly subtle philosophy of science, you have yet to tell me how to write one…
Professor — You were so eager to add frames, context, structure, to your ‘mere descriptions’, how would you have listened to me?
S — But what’s the difference between a good and a bad ANT text?
P — Now, that’s a good question!
S — At last?
P — At last! Answer: The same as between a good and a bad laboratory. No more, no less.
S — Well, okay, um, thanks… It was nice of you to talk to me. But I think after all, instead of ANT… I was thinking of using Luhmann’s system theory as an underlying framework— that seems to hold a lot of promise, autopoiesis and all that. Or maybe I will use a bit of both.
P — …
S — Don’t you like Luhmann?
P — I would leave aside all ‘underlying frameworks’, if I were you.
S — But, your sort of ‘science’, it seems to me, means breaking all the rules of social science training.
P — I prefer to break them and follow my actors.

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Reddit
  • connotea

« spaces of vernacular creativity dawn of the organised networks? »

Actions

  • rss Comments rss
  • trackback Trackback

Informations

  • Date : 3 October 2006
  • Categories : PhD progress

3 responses to “just (describe) it”

3 10 2006
Anne (20:58:02) :

Go Wittgenstein!

10 11 2006
lenina (23:48:50) :

Hi, I’ve used ANT as a theory and methodology in my research on webfilms. I’ve submitted and my VIVA is on the 18th Dec! Like you, I’m interested in issues of convergence and in fact that’s what I’m planning to research (convergence of video games and online video) after my PhD. My blog is not really academic though but I thought I give you a shout :)

good luck with your research!

11 11 2006
Jean (11:37:04) :

hi lenina, thanks for saying hello–i’m really interested in your phd! What did you end up saying about webfilms, if I can be so cruel as to make the horrific demand that you “summarise your phd in one sentence”?

Leave a comment

You can use these tags : <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


Pages

  • About
  • YouTube Book
  • Research
  • Publications

Tags

advertising blogs and blogging cool finds craft cultural studies digital storytelling DIY film/video flickr gender history of tech hype labour life in academia literacy music and sound music scenes networked culture PhD progress photoblogs photography politics postdoc publications etc quick links readings research methods silliness site techlog social shaping the commons Uncategorized urban cultures vernacular creativity youtube

Recent Comments

  • Yngve Troye Nordkvelle on Short courses in digital storytelling at QUT
  • Sophie on Why I’m deleting my Facebook account
  • satyask on Why I’m deleting my Facebook account
  • Home Recording Center » Garage Band Tutorial - Get the Missing Manual Here on GarageBand: Usability vs. Hackability
  • SB on Flussgeist & ambient intimacy

Archives

Latest Entries at Propagating Media

My other places

  • Propagating Media
  • del.icio.us

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox