to get better art we just need more love songs

I’ve been thinking again about relational aesthetics thanks to Kris Cohen who has been shooting me some of the discussions occurring around it and related matters in art theory, and generally hurting my brain, in a really good way. Being the intellectual dilettante I am, I’m just genuinely interested, but as before, I’m also trying to think through whether there’s any mileage in reworking art or literary theory concepts for popular culture and/or “vernacular creativity”. Not just whether I could do it, but whether I should bother.

Because maybe I’ve just got it back to front. Not for the first time, it’s crossed my mind that maybe cultural studies approaches to the active audience in relation to both television and music already has me where I need to go. I’m really just talking about identifying media that constitutes the relationship between the ‘producer’, the ‘text’, and the ‘audience’ in a particular way – a way that respects the audiences’ intelligence, demonstrates an understanding of the dynamics of engagement as social practice, and constitutes textuality as a vehicle for that engagement, and not the other way round. That is the juice that participatory popular culture runs on, and this beautiful video does just that, with grace, warmth and a sense of humility. It represents audienceing quite literally as the practice of folding music into individual but shared social experience.

And hey, it helps that it’s one of my favourite love songs.

Direct link for RSS readers.

Plus, it’s the best acting performance I’ve ever seen from Daniela Sea.

Meanwhile, I will persist with my book larnin’ about relational aesthetics and art theory.

4 thoughts to “to get better art we just need more love songs”

  1. thanks for posing that. this song arrived in my inbox one day with the instruction “get out, bring your ipod, listen to this as you walk though the park”


  2. wow, that’s a lovely story trine!

    P.S. I neglected to say what the song actually is for those who don’t know it (if there is anyone like that!). It’s Bright Eyes, “First Day Of My Life”.

  3. wow – hadn’t seen this before. thanks for posting it.

    you know, it’s precisely beautiful objects like these that i have the least inclination to theorise. wonder what that says?


Comments are closed.