<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obligatory Google Buzz post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://creativitymachine.net/2010/02/16/obligatory-google-buzz-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://creativitymachine.net/2010/02/16/obligatory-google-buzz-post/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:07:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://creativitymachine.net/2010/02/16/obligatory-google-buzz-post/comment-page-1/#comment-52865</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 04:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creativitymachine.net/2010/02/16/obligatory-google-buzz-post/#comment-52865</guid>
		<description>Bit late on this, but great post. The stuff about class/identity politics and Google&#039;s blindnesses here is spot on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bit late on this, but great post. The stuff about class/identity politics and Google&#8217;s blindnesses here is spot on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean</title>
		<link>http://creativitymachine.net/2010/02/16/obligatory-google-buzz-post/comment-page-1/#comment-52651</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 07:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creativitymachine.net/2010/02/16/obligatory-google-buzz-post/#comment-52651</guid>
		<description>Hi Marko - agreed. To which I would add not only clear enough, but in fact the other way round, so that we opt IN to various layers of publicity as we find our way into each new platform or service. Much gentler, but probably total fantasy of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Marko &#8211; agreed. To which I would add not only clear enough, but in fact the other way round, so that we opt IN to various layers of publicity as we find our way into each new platform or service. Much gentler, but probably total fantasy of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marko Teräs</title>
		<link>http://creativitymachine.net/2010/02/16/obligatory-google-buzz-post/comment-page-1/#comment-52648</link>
		<dc:creator>Marko Teräs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creativitymachine.net/2010/02/16/obligatory-google-buzz-post/#comment-52648</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jean for these thoughts! Nice to see someone taking a bit time in thinking of these things a bit further and not just jumping for joy everytime another new social site opens (although, I admit doing that occasionally :-/).

I feel that some services should make the privacy settings at least as clear as possible. This isn&#039;t that much my problem, but I&#039;ve heard from many &quot;ordinary people&quot;, meaning those who aren&#039;t born with a birth certificate with a Google account already installed, that they are mostly concerned about the privacy issues. And these could be more easily handled if these things were clear enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jean for these thoughts! Nice to see someone taking a bit time in thinking of these things a bit further and not just jumping for joy everytime another new social site opens (although, I admit doing that occasionally :-/).</p>
<p>I feel that some services should make the privacy settings at least as clear as possible. This isn&#8217;t that much my problem, but I&#8217;ve heard from many &#8220;ordinary people&#8221;, meaning those who aren&#8217;t born with a birth certificate with a Google account already installed, that they are mostly concerned about the privacy issues. And these could be more easily handled if these things were clear enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean</title>
		<link>http://creativitymachine.net/2010/02/16/obligatory-google-buzz-post/comment-page-1/#comment-52644</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creativitymachine.net/2010/02/16/obligatory-google-buzz-post/#comment-52644</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this Bernie. Hope you&#039;re surviving winter in Oxford!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this Bernie. Hope you&#8217;re surviving winter in Oxford!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernie Hogan</title>
		<link>http://creativitymachine.net/2010/02/16/obligatory-google-buzz-post/comment-page-1/#comment-52637</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie Hogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creativitymachine.net/2010/02/16/obligatory-google-buzz-post/#comment-52637</guid>
		<description>Thanks for speaking on this Jean. This is very much aligned with my thoughts. 

Google Buzz is another example of a specific viewpoint, taken by a specific culture of people, that suggests one life: one identity on and off and everywhere. It is presumed not only to be inevitable but positive. Its not - its simple, its privileged and its technocratic. Some people have no choice but to manage competing expectations. 

Embedded in this ideology is a sense that it is okay to relinquish control over our identity to the information curators of our digital lives. It is a sense that these people get to rewrite the social contract of information storage at their whim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for speaking on this Jean. This is very much aligned with my thoughts. </p>
<p>Google Buzz is another example of a specific viewpoint, taken by a specific culture of people, that suggests one life: one identity on and off and everywhere. It is presumed not only to be inevitable but positive. Its not &#8211; its simple, its privileged and its technocratic. Some people have no choice but to manage competing expectations. </p>
<p>Embedded in this ideology is a sense that it is okay to relinquish control over our identity to the information curators of our digital lives. It is a sense that these people get to rewrite the social contract of information storage at their whim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
